TypingFastest vs MonkeyType vs TypeRacer: Honest Review
I spent months on all three typing test sites. Here's what each does well, where they fall short, and which one I open every morning.
TypingFastest Team
Typing speed & productivity experts • About us
In This Article
Photo by Sergey Zolkin / Unsplash
Why Most Typists End Up Bouncing Between Three Sites
Everyone who gets serious about typing speed eventually lands on the same three sites. MonkeyType. TypeRacer. And if they stumble across it, TypingFastest.
I've used all three — obsessively. Like, "my browser history looks concerning" levels of obsessively. And they're all genuinely good at different things. But most comparison articles just list features in bullet points and call it a day. I wanted to actually tell you what it feels like to use each one daily, where each one annoyed me, and which one I keep coming back to.
Here's the thing nobody mentions: the test you use affects your results. I consistently score 5-8 WPM higher on MonkeyType than TypeRacer. Same fingers, same day, different numbers. The text selection, the timer mechanics, even the font can nudge your score up or down. So "which typing test is best" isn't just a preference question — it determines whether the WPM you're telling people is actually reliable.
If you care about knowing your real typing speed, the tool you choose to measure it matters more than you'd think. I talked about this in my piece on how to type faster — your practice environment shapes your results as much as your technique does.
So I decided to actually use all three as my daily driver, each for at least two weeks, and keep notes on what worked, what didn't, and where I found myself drifting back. The results surprised me.
MonkeyType — Clean, Minimal, and Addictively Customizable
Photo by Fotis Fotopoulos / Unsplash
MonkeyType is the one most people find first these days. It's gorgeous. Dark theme by default, zero clutter, and a settings menu that goes absurdly deep — custom themes, custom fonts, custom test lengths, smooth caret animation, live WPM graph. I've seen people spend more time tweaking settings than actually typing.
The test itself is solid. Random common English words by default, and you can switch to quotes, custom text, or code snippets. The instant feedback — wrong characters flash red as you type — is one of the best implementations I've used. Your fingers learn faster when mistakes are that visible.
Where MonkeyType falls short for me is the solo experience. There's no multiplayer racing. No real-time competition. It's you versus the clock, every single time. That works great if you're doing structured practice drills, but after a week of solo tests I get restless. I need the adrenaline of racing a real person to keep showing up.
The analytics are basic too. You get a results screen after each test, but there's no long-term progress dashboard that tracks your weekly averages or percentile ranking. For someone trying to break through a plateau, that lack of historical data is a real gap.
If you're purely focused on accuracy drills and you enjoy tweaking settings, MonkeyType is hard to beat. But it's a training tool, not a complete typing platform.
One more thing worth mentioning — MonkeyType does have an account system that saves your history if you sign in. But even with an account, the data visualization is pretty bare bones. You get a list of recent tests, not the kind of trend analysis that tells you whether you're actually getting faster week over week. For tracking real progress over time, I needed something more.
TypeRacer — The OG That's Starting to Show Its Age
Photo by XPS / Unsplash
TypeRacer has been around since 2008, and honestly, that's both its biggest strength and its most obvious problem.
The competitive side is still unmatched in terms of sheer player count. You queue into a race with strangers, type a real quote from a book or movie, and watch little cars inch across the screen. The first time you beat someone by half a second after typing a passage from Hitchhiker's Guide, you understand why people have been playing this for almost two decades.
But the interface? It feels like it hasn't changed since 2012. The design is cluttered, there are ads everywhere on the free tier, and the typing input has this slight lag that drives me nuts. When you're pushing past 90 WPM, even tiny latency hiccups break your flow. The right practice routine depends on getting into a flow state — and TypeRacer's UI interrupts that more than it should in 2026.
The text selection is a double-edged sword. Real quotes give you genuinely varied content, which is great for versatility. But it also means you'll hit uncommon words, weird punctuation, and dialogue formatting that tanks your score randomly. If you're trying to get a consistent WPM baseline, that randomness is frustrating.
TypeRacer earned its legend status for pioneering competitive typing online. But the typing experience hasn't kept up with what's possible now, and the free version punishes you with enough ads to break anyone's concentration.
I still jump into TypeRacer maybe once a week for the nostalgia factor. Typing a passage from The Lord of the Rings while racing strangers hits different. But for daily practice and tracking? I moved on.
Where TypingFastest Actually Pulls Ahead
I'll be upfront — I'm biased here. But I switched to TypingFastest as my daily driver about four months ago, and I haven't gone back.
What hooked me immediately was having everything in one place. Practice mode for solo drills. Multiplayer racing for real-time competition against actual people. A leaderboard that tracks your rank over time so you can watch yourself climb. Even a garage where you customize your race car — which sounds silly until you realize it's the exact kind of reward loop that makes you do "just one more race" at midnight.
The typing test itself is fast. Noticeably responsive. No input lag, no loading screens between tests, no ads breaking your concentration. You hit enter and you're typing within a second. For someone who runs 15-20 tests a day, that smoothness compounds into a genuinely better experience.
Multiplayer racing is where TypingFastest really pulls away from both MonkeyType and TypeRacer. Matchmaking is quick, you don't need to create an account to start racing, and the real-time speed comparison against your opponent makes every race feel high-stakes. I covered the best typing race games of 2026 recently, and TypingFastest's racing mode is still the one I find myself launching every morning.
What surprised me most was the practice mode quality. It's not just "type random words." You can drill specific key zones, practice with punctuation and numbers, and target the exact weak spots holding your WPM down. Combine that with racing for motivation and the leaderboard for long-term tracking, and it's the most complete typing platform I've used.
Is it perfect? No. The community is still growing, so late-night races sometimes take a few extra seconds to match. And if you want the extreme customization depth of MonkeyType's settings, you won't find that here.
But for actually improving your typing speed while having fun doing it — not just staring at a solo test screen — nothing I've tried in 2026 comes close. I've pushed my daily average from 72 to 86 WPM since switching, and I honestly think the racing element is responsible for at least half of that gain.
Here's my honest recommendation: use MonkeyType when you want a quiet accuracy session. Pull up TypeRacer when you're feeling nostalgic or want the biggest random lobby. But for your daily practice, your competitive racing, and your actual long-term progress tracking, start with TypingFastest. That's where I spend my time, and my WPM thanks me for it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MonkeyType better than TypeRacer for testing typing speed?
MonkeyType is better for solo practice and accuracy drilling because of its clean interface and instant visual feedback on errors. TypeRacer is better for competitive racing with its large player base and real-text quotes. MonkeyType tends to give slightly higher WPM scores because it uses common English words while TypeRacer uses real quotes with unusual punctuation. For the most complete experience combining both [practice](/practice) and [racing](/race), TypingFastest covers both use cases in one platform.
Why do I get different WPM scores on different typing tests?
Different typing tests use different text sources, timing methods, and error-counting rules, which all affect your score. Tests with common short words like MonkeyType tend to produce higher WPM numbers. Tests with real quotes or unusual vocabulary like TypeRacer produce lower scores. Font size, input lag, and even the color scheme can also affect your performance. For the most reliable baseline, use the same typing test consistently and average your scores over 3-5 attempts.
Which typing test is best for beginners in 2026?
For beginners, TypingFastest offers the best balance of guided practice and fun. The practice mode lets you drill specific key zones at your own pace, while multiplayer racing provides motivation to keep improving. MonkeyType is also beginner-friendly with its minimal interface but lacks the competitive element that helps beginners stay motivated. TypeRacer can be frustrating for beginners because the real-text quotes include uncommon words and tricky punctuation.
Is TypingFastest completely free to use?
Yes, TypingFastest is completely free. You can take typing tests, join multiplayer races, track your progress on the leaderboard, and customize your race car in the garage without paying anything or even creating an account. There are no ads interrupting your typing sessions and no premium tier that locks core features behind a paywall.
Can I use multiple typing test sites to improve faster?
Using multiple typing test sites can help because each one trains different aspects of your typing. MonkeyType is excellent for accuracy drilling with its instant error feedback. TypeRacer builds vocabulary versatility with real-text quotes. TypingFastest combines competitive pressure with structured practice. The most effective approach is to pick one as your daily driver for consistent tracking and use the others for specific drill types.
How do I know if my typing test score is accurate?
An accurate typing test score comes from a test that is at least 60 seconds long, uses varied text you have not memorized, counts errors against your score as net WPM rather than raw WPM, and runs on a responsive platform with no input lag. Take 3-5 tests and average them for the most reliable number. Test at the same time of day since most people type 5-10 WPM faster in the morning than in the afternoon.
Ready to Test Your Typing Speed?
Take a free typing test, practice touch typing, or race against others in real-time multiplayer races.
Start Typing Test →Related Articles
Programmer Typing Speed — Why It’s Slower Than You Think
Most developers assume they type fast. I clocked my coding speed vs prose speed — the gap shocked me. Here’s why it happens and how to close it.
What Percentile Is Your Typing Speed? I Checked Mine
At 68 WPM I assumed I was fast — turns out I’m only in the 73rd percentile. Here’s the full WPM percentile chart and where you probably rank.
Do Gamers Actually Type Faster? I Ran the Numbers
I had 30 gamers and 20 non-gamers take the same typing test. PC gamers averaged 15 WPM higher — but the reason isn't what you'd expect.